ENGR90033课程作业辅导：实习生的学习经历

NGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

10 Task 4 – Final Report

The Final Report is a detailed analysis of the learning experience that has been your internship. It will

explain your role in the host organisation, what has been accomplished, and what has been have learnt.

10.1 Length, submission and marks

• The Final Report must be no more than 8000 words in total. The Final Report should consist of the

following:

o An executive summary (maximum 400 words)

o The body of the report – the introduction to the conclusion, inclusive (maximum 5000

words)

o The appendices

It is expected that most students will write around 4000 words for the body of the report.

o It is expected that students will typically spend approximately 25 hours on the report to

achieve a passing mark.

• The Final Report is to be submitted using Turnitin through the subject LMS site.

• The Final Report is worth 50% of the subject mark.

• The Final Report will receive a mark out of 100.

10.2 Audience

Your Final Report will only be read by the Melbourne School of Engineering academic and coordination

staff. This will allow you to fully express yourself in relation to your personal and professional

development. Information reported in your Final Report will not be shared with your employer or student

peers.

10.3 Description

Your internship has been a rare opportunity to experience the industry environment while still studying.

Within this environment you have been given responsibilities, performed work to benefit others and

interacted with a wide range of people. The Final Report is a deep reflection on this experience. If done

properly you will better understand what you have learnt and can use this learning in the future,

particularly when you begin seeking graduate employment.

The objective of your report is to inform your reader:

• about the environment you worked in and the role that you held;

• how the communication and teamwork requirements differ between an industry environment and

a university environment;

• how you applied your university learning; and

• how you developed your communication and other professional skills.

Your report is expected to be a demonstration of your written communication capability. It should be clear,

concise, focused and informative.

10.3.1 Appendices – Engagement Reports

The Engagement Reports do not have to be included in your appendices. These should only be included if

they are referred to by the main body of your report.

ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2024, Version: 1.01

The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 31 of 44

W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

10.3.2 Template

A template is available for you to use and is accessible on the LMS:

Final Report Template.docx

It is not compulsory for you to use the template, but it is highly recommended as you must include the

described information in an easily accessible format.

10.4 Assessment

10.4.1 Assessment criteria

Criteria Outline of what is sought

Role

(20%)

A clear explanation of the following and how they interrelate:

1. Your role and how it fitted within your team and management structure.

2. How the organization’s structure or structures differ to those in your university

environment and the significance of this.

3. The tasks you were engaged in and your associated achievements.

4. The impact of the work you were involved in, in relation to both your host

organization and other stakeholders.

5. The quality, information and other management systems used in your host

organization, why they were used and how they impacted the work that you

did.

6. The sources of information you used to complete your work within your host

organisation, how they were sourced and your confidence in them.

Knowledge and

Methods

(20%)

A clear explanation of the key skills, knowledge and methods that you have used to do

the following:

1. Solve complex technical problems set within broad contextual constraints.

2. Conduct and manage technical projects3

.

As well as an explanation of:

3. How you have applied and developed these skills.

4. What related skills you will need to develop before becoming an effective

practicing engineer

This criterion directly relates to the EA competencies associated with Engineering

Application Ability (2.1, 2.3 & 2.4) and the related C&IS graduate attributes.

3 These may be “projects” of any size, typically for interns these will range from individual tasks assigned to you, to

small team projects. Conducting and managing may involve multiple tasks.

ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2024, Version: 1.01

The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 32 of 44

W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

Criteria Outline of what is sought

Professional

Skills

(25%)

A clear explanation of the professional skills and personal attributes that you have used

and experienced, required to:

1. Operate in a team environment.

2. Communicate effectively within an industry context.

3. Effectively work with clients/stakeholders.

As well as an explanation of:

4. How you have applied and developed these skills.

5. How the application of these skills impacts engineering work.

6. What related skills you will need to develop before becoming an effective

practicing engineer.

7. Observed behaviours and actions that impacted on your team’s ability to be

successful and the related longer-term impacts on projects.

This section directly relates to the EA competencies associated with Professional and

Personal Attributes and the related C&IS graduate attributes

Structure and

Readability

(30%)

The Final Report should be:

• logical and cohesive;

• clear of objective with a strong narrative;

• concise and complete;

• easily understood; and

• easily navigated.

Figures and tables should be used where they aid understanding.

Executive

Summary

(5%)

The Executive Summary should offer a succinct overview of the report. It should

summarise your objective, your conclusion and the key points of your report.

ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2024, Version: 1.01

The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 33 of 44

W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

10.4.2 Assessment rubric

POOR (0–49%) PASS (50–59%) GOOD (60 – 69%) EXCELLENT (70 – 89%) OUTSTANDING (90 – 100%)

Role (20%)

Addresses the Role criterion

items in a superficial and

disparate way with no significant

interconnectedness.

Addresses all of the Role

criterion items, with

reasonable detail on the

descriptive components such

as role and tasks but with

little insight on the impact

and context ones. Some

interconnectedness identified.

Addresses all of the Role criterion

items with some detail and insight.

How the items interconnect with each

other is discussed in a basic but useful

way. Reasonable examples are used to

illustrate points.

As “Good” with a strong

understanding of how the

items interconnect and impact

on each other. Responses to

impact and rationale show

good insight. Examples are

detailed and useful.

As “Excellent” with deep

connections to the

student’s personal

internship experience.

Examples are well

thought out and explored

in detail demonstrating

good insight.

Knowledge and Methods (20%)

Skills, knowledge and methods

are identified in a superficial

manner, with limited discussion

of application and development.

Skills, knowledge and

methods are discussed in a

general way with some detail.

Application and development

are addressed but lack insight

with only basic examples.

Skills, knowledge and methods are

discussed in a specific and detailed

way. Application and development are

addressed in detail with reasonable

examples. The links between skills,

knowledge, methods, application and

development are explored. Reasonable

understanding of EA competencies/CIS

grad. attributes is demonstrated.

As “Good” with good examples,

a strong understanding of

personal development required

and detailed references to past

study and learning. Good

understanding of EA

competencies/CIS grad.

attributes is demonstrated.

As “Excellent” with good

insight into the links

between skills,

knowledge, methods,

application and

development. Response

is closely linked to

student’s personal

internship experience.

Professional Skills (25%)

Skills and attributes are

identified in a superficial

manner, with limited discussion

of application, impact and

development.

Skills and attributes are

discussed in a general way

with some detail. Application,

impact and development are

addressed but lack insight

with only basic examples.

Limited observation

demonstrated.

Skills and attributes are discussed in a

specific and detailed way. Application,

impact and development are

addressed in detail with reasonable

examples. The links between skills,

attributes, application, impact and

development are explored.

Observations are reasonable.

Reasonable understanding of EA

competencies/CIS grad. attributes is

demonstrated.

As “Good” with strong

examples and good insight into

the impact of professional

skills. Understanding of

personal development

requirements is good.

Observations demonstrate

insight. Good understanding of

EA competencies/CIS grad.

attributes is demonstrated.

As “Excellent” with good

insight into the links

between skills, attributes,

impact, application and

development. Response

is closely linked to

student’s personal

internship experience.

ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2024, Version: 1.01

The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 34 of 44

W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

POOR (0–49%) PASS (50–59%) GOOD (60 – 69%) EXCELLENT (70 – 89%) OUTSTANDING (90 – 100%)

Structure and Readability (30%)

Ideas are not connected

(coherence) and content flows

poorly (cohesion). May be largely

written in a question and answer

form. Objective of the document

is unclear. Redundant and

repeated content, while key

information is absent.

May have multiple problems

with grammar, spelling and

expression. Difficult to navigate

due to missing elements or poor

headings.

No figures/tables used,

inappropriate, poorly designed

or poorly explained.

Reasonable coherence and

cohesion. Flows like a report.

Objective is clear but may not

be fully achieved or properly

aligned with task. Some

redundancy may be present

or required information

missing.

Few grammatical, spelling and

expression mistakes. Headings

are reasonable and navigation

elements are present.

Figures/tables are generally

included where useful, with

reasonable design and basic

explanations.

Referencing generally used

where required.

Good coherence and cohesion.

Objective is clear, achieved and

appropriate. Minimal redundancy and

all key information is provided.

Included appendices are referred to

and useful.

Minimal grammatical, spelling and

expression mistakes. Evidence of proof

reading.

Good clear headings with all navigation

elements present (page #, Table of

Contents).

Figures/tables are used where helpful,

and are generally well designed, well

explained, and appropriate.

Referencing used as required.

As “Good” with excellent

coherence and cohesion,

maintaining a strong narrative

throughout the document.

Content is well thought out;

clearly and concisely achieving

the report’s objective.

Strong evidence of repeated

review, with negligible mistakes

in grammar, spelling and

expression.

Overall presentation is at a

professional standard.

Figures/tables used are of an

excellent standard and closely

linked to content.

Figures/tables are used in all

key areas where they would aid

understanding.

As “Excellent” with all

elements coming

together to make the

document clear,

interesting and enjoyable

to read.

Standard is equivalent of

a professional report that

has been carefully and

repeatedly reviewed.

Exec. Summary (5%)

Executive summary is missing

key information such as the

conclusion or objective.

Executive summary

summarises most of the key

points but contains significant

unnecessary content.

Maximum mark if executive

summary word limit

exceeded.

Executive summary addresses all the

key points but may contain some

unnecessary content.

Executive summary provides a

mostly clear summary of the

key content without containing

unnecessary content.

Executive summary

provides a complete,

clear and concise

overview of the report.

ENGR90033 – Internship: Student Guide

Melbourne School of Engineering Date:7/03/2024, Version: 1.01

The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia Page 35 of 44

W: www.eng.unimelb.edu.au

10.4.3 Assessment penalties

The following penalties are applicable to the Final Report. The minimum mark is 0.

1. Submission requirements

a. Incorrect file format = -10 marks

b. Missing fields on the cover sheet = -5 marks

c. Missing cover sheet = -10 marks

d. Main body over 5000 words = Only first 5000 words assessed and -10 marks

e. Submission over 8000 words = Only first 8000 words assessed and -10 marks (-5 marks if

main body is also over 5000 words)

f. Executive summary over 400 words = Maximum limit on mark for Executive Summary

criterion

g. Late = -10 marks per day for up to 5 days after which the submission will not be accepted